Argentina
The president and the potbangers
Times
are getting tougher for Cristina Fernández, but she is not beaten yet
Sep 29th 2012 | BUENOS AIRES | from the print edition
EVERY Argentine
politician knows that clanging
pots and pans are the sound
of trouble. In 2001, after the government froze bank accounts, furious residents of Buenos
Aires staged nightly cacerolazos (pot bangings) until the president
resigned. On September 13th it was the turn of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner,
the current president, to face the raucous music. Tens of thousands filled the
capital’s streets wielding kitchen implements. Ms Fernández was in San Juan, a
provincial capital, which saw a smaller protest.
Her aides
dismissed the protesters as an unpatriotic elite. “They’re more concerned about what happens in
Miami than in San Juan,” said Juan Manuel Abal Medina, the cabinet chief. Ms
Fernández has weathered cacerolazos before. In 2008 farmers staged pot-clanking
demonstrations after she tried to raise taxes on soyabean exports. She
was re-elected three years later.
But the latest cacerolazo
looks more like a turning point than a stumble. The main reason is that the
economy has run out of steam. Between 2003 and 2011, Argentina’s annual average
growth rate of 7.7% was Latin America’s second-highest. This year, even by the
questionable official numbers, it is set to be the lowest (see chart).
Distortions have
been building for years under Ms Fernández and her late husband and
predecessor, Néstor Kirchner. Price caps have squelched investment in energy and led the treasury to subsidise
fuel imports. Public
spending has soared,
yielding a primary fiscal
deficit of 3% of GDP. Thanks to the Kirchners’ quarrel with the IMF,
Argentina can only raise external credit at steep interest rates. So the Central Bank has
printed pesos. Inflation is around 25% according to unofficial estimates.
Until now, the
economy has grown despite these policies, mainly because of high prices for its
farm products, and exports to Brazil. But this year drought parched soyabean
fields, and Brazil stalled. In addition $18 billion of debt and other payments
came due that Argentina could not refinance. Desperate for hard currency, the government imposed curbs on imports and
foreign-exchange transactions. It scared investors further by
expropriating a majority stake in YPF, the national oil company, held by
Spain’s Repsol. All this turned a soft landing into a screeching halt.
A second problem
for the president is that she has alienated large chunks of her amorphous Peronist movement. Mr
Kirchner dealt deftly with its barons, mayors and unions, who can rally crowds
to the streets and voters to the polls. Since being widowed in 2010, Ms
Fernández has sidelined
many of her husband’s allies, relying instead on a group of youngish leftist
activists led by her son, Máximo.
This year’s cash crunch has brought
conflict with the Peronist machine. Workers have seen their take-home pay drop in real
terms. Hugo Moyano, the head of Argentina’s biggest trade-union
confederation, has turned against Ms Fernández, accusing her of acting like “a
goddess…who has to be knelt before”.
The squeeze has also hit
local governments. Ms Fernández has cut the share in total public spending of discretional transfers
to provinces and municipalities by half in the past two years. In June she
delayed a transfer of $250m to Buenos Aires province, leaving it unable to pay
its staff. Her dealings with its Peronist governor, Daniel Scioli, remain
tense. José Manuel de la Sota, the Peronist governor of Córdoba, now consorts
with the opposition.
Ms Fernández has
also alienated the middle class, some of whom rallied to her last year. That is
potentially dangerous. “You can’t win an election here without the middle
class,” says Joaquín Morales Solá, a columnist for La Nación, an
opposition newspaper. “Very few people say they’re poor. They’re culturally
middle class. They have the same aspirations.”
It is sections
of the middle class who are now banging their pots. They are disappointed by declining public services and
public safety. In a recent survey by Carolina Moreno of the Catholic
University, 31% of respondents said they had been victims of a crime, up from
22% in 2004. A commuter
train crash in February that killed 51 people highlighted the government’s neglect of the
transport network.
Controls on access to dollars and negative real interest rates make it hard for the middle class to travel or
save. They are offended by the president’s use of the tax agency to persecute opponents, and
annoyed by the frequent interruptions of television shows to broadcast her speeches,
such as one opening a technology fair.
Ms Fernández’s
fortunes will probably improve before a legislative election due in October 2013. The
prospect of a better harvest, a rebound in Brazil and an easier debt-repayment schedule
all mean she should be able to relax the economic squeeze and buy back the loyalty of wavering
Peronist operators. Moreover, the opposition is fragmented and bereft of
leaders.
Yet Ms Fernández
will need more than a modest rebound
if she is to prolong her grip
on power. She has no heir-apparent:
her vice-president, Amado Boudou, has been hamstrung by corruption accusations, and her son has never run for office. Some of
her allies have suggested changing
the constitution so that she can run for a third consecutive term, though she has not
discussed the idea publicly. A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote of both
houses of Congress, which looks difficult to attain. And since polls suggest
that the public opposes the idea, her opponents are sure to use the spectre of
a third term when campaigning next year. But Ms Fernández has beaten the odds before.
And no one can question her hunger for power.
Note: Useful vocabulary to learn highlighted in
yellow
http://www.economist.com/node/21563732/print
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario